RELIGIOUS CONFLICTS

IS RELIGIOUS CONFLICT ETHICAL?

-          Ethics directs the most basic consequences of the moral imperative “do good and avoid evil”

-          Moral moves forward to make the way easier stating precepts to enable people to do what they have to do and avoid what they mustn’t do.

Let’s accept this difference between ethics and moral and apply it to the religious conflict. We could state that

-      First, trying to justify violence as a way to spread the religious ideas is unethical (lack of  ethics)

-          Second, it is the religious leaders’ job to look for peace and harmony in an active way

If we have a look at the RAE Dictionary, we will see that the first meaning of conflict is “combat, fight, row”. In the Oxford Dictionary the meaning: “prolonged armed struggle” comes second place.

Well, the nearer our concept of conflict is to the Spanish definition, that is; “combat, fight, row”, the more incompatible it is with religion. In a strict way, the term conflict (understood as combat, fight and row) is contradictory with religion. The term religion comes from the Latin word “re-ligare” (unite/join again) and its main task is to take man towards God and what is more, love enemies.

The person who follows and practices a religion cannot hate but love.

HOLY WARS (adapted from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/war/religious/holywar.shtml)

Modern people often regard the idea of a holy war as a contradiction. Killing thousands of people and causing wholesale destruction seems to be as far from holiness as one can get.

But religion and war have gone hand in hand for a long time. Armies went into battle believing that God was with them, often after prayers and sacrifices to keep God on their side. In tribal cultures when a country lost a war they often had to change to the worship of the winner's gods.

However involving God as part of the campaign does not make a war a holy war - for a war to be a holy war, religion has to be the driving force.

Holy wars usually have three elements:

·         The achievement of a religious goal

·         Authorised by a religious leader

·         A spiritual reward for those who take part

Many of the wars fought in the name of religion do conform to the just war conditions, but not all of them.

Religious causes

Francis Bacon said there were five causes for holy war: (he wrote in a Christian context, but the categories would be usable by any faith)

·         to spread the faith

·         to regain countries that were once Christian, even though there are no Christians left there

·         to rescue Christians in countries that were once Christian from 'the servitude of the infidels'

·         recover and purify consecrated places that are presently being 'polluted and profaned'

·         avenge blasphemous acts, or cruelties and killings of Christians (even if these took place long ago)

Only the first of these causes is completely outside the scope of the conventional idea of a just cause. Some of the other causes, because of the length of time that can pass since the offending act took place are probably not just causes either.

Lawful authority

The legitimate authority for a holy war is not the government of a state  but the Church, or the relevant organisation or person who heads the religious institution concerned.

In ancient times the authority was often God. This would not be the case today.

Personal reward

The third condition of a holy war is a spiritual reward for those who take part. The doctrine of the just war does not refer to any personal rewards for the participants - and such rewards would be against such a generally austere doctrine.

History

The first holy war was probably in October 312 CE when the Roman emperor Constantine saw a vision of the cross in the sky with this inscription "in hoc signo vinces" (in this sign you will win).Constantine trusted the vision and had the cross inscribed on his soldiers' armor. Even though his forces were outnumbered, he won the battle against an army that was using pagan enchantment. (Historians regard this as a turning point in Christianity's fortune.)The great series of western holy wars were the Crusades, which lasted from 1095 until 1291 CE. The aim was to capture the sacred places in the Holy Land from the Muslims who lived there, so it was intended as a war to right wrongs done against Christianity.